5-year Breast Cancer-specific Survival Research Articles

Abstract PO1-28-10: Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes identify patients with stage I TNBC with excellent outcome without chemotherapy

Abstract Introduction International guidelines recommend chemotherapy for most patients with stage I triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), except for special histological subtypes. However, the absolute benefit of systemic treatment for all stage I TNBC patients is not well known and no tools are yet available to select patients with an excellent prognosis for whom the chemotherapy can be safely omitted. High levels of stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are strongly associated with favorable prognosis in TNBC, however, data solely focusing on patients with stage I TNBC who did not receive chemotherapy are lacking. Methods Patients with pT1N0M0 TNBC diagnosed between 2005 and 2015 not treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were identified from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and linked to the national pathology database (PALGA). Newly sectioned hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) slides were used for central review of the histology and sTILs scoring following the International TIL working group guidelines (www.tilsinbreastcancer.org). Cause of death was provided by Statistics Netherlands (CBS). Primary endpoint was breast-cancer specific survival (BCSS) at 5-, 10- and 15-years for prespecified sTILs cut-offs of 30%, 50% and 75% sTILs. Results sTILs were evaluated for 1,041 patients with stage I TNBC who did not receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Mean age at diagnosis was 64.4 years [range 26 – 96] and median sTILs value was 5%. Most tumors (91.5%) were invasive ductal adenocarcinomas of no special type (NST) and 6.6% were of histological special types. In 52% of the patients the tumor was >1cm (pT1cN0). Median follow-up was 9.4 years in which 335 patients had died, of whom 107 due to breast cancer. Patients with pT1abN0 tumors had a favorable prognosis compared with patients with a pT1cN0 tumor (HR 0.47, CI 0.32- 0.72). 10-year BCSS in patients with pT1ab was 91.8% and 85.8% in patients with pT1c tumors. In the overall cohort, sTILs-levels of at least 30% were associated with better BCSS compared to sTILs < 30% (HR 0.45, CI 0.26 – 0.77), with 10year-BCSS of 96% and 87%, respectively (table 1). Patients with TNBC of special histological subtype had low sTILs (median 1%). A univariate cox model showed no association between sTILs (continuous) and BCSS in TNBC of special histological subtype (p = 0.56). Next, the prognostic value of sTILs was evaluated separately for pT1ab and pT1c. High sTILs ≥50% were not associated with improved BCSS compared to low sTILs < 50% in patients with pT1ab (HR 1.35, CI 0.65 – 2.82, p = 0.42). In contrast, high sTILs ≥50% showed a strong prognostic importance over low sTILs < 50% (HR 0.27, CI 0.10 – 0.74) in patients with pT1C tumors. We found excellent 10year-BCSS of 95% for patients if sTILs ≥50%, which further increases to 98% with sTILs ≥75% contrasting 10year-BCSS of 83% for patients with sTILs < 30%. Conclusions sTILs-levels provide important prognostic information in patients with stage I TNBC who did not receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The outcome of patients with pT1c TNBC and sTILs ≥50% was excellent, with 10year-BCSS of 95%, and 98% if sTILs >75%. This large registry study provides a foundation for clinical trials in patients with stage I TNBC with high TILs to prospectively confirm their excellent survival without chemotherapy. Citation Format: Veerle Geurts, Sara Balduzzi, Hugo Horlings, Tessa G Steenbruggen, Sabine Siesling, Sylvia Adams, Gabe Sonke, Roberto Salgado, Marleen Kok. Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes identify patients with stage I TNBC with excellent outcome without chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-28-10.

Abstract PO3-02-06: Predictive Factors for adjuvant radiation use in patients >70 years with pT1N0 HR+ breast cancers

Abstract Introduction: In 2004 the CALGB 9343 study reported that women >70 years of age with pT1NO hormone receptor positive breast cancer received no meaningful benefit from breast irradiation following lumpectomy. Although there was a modest reduction in local recurrence, there was no improvement in rates of mastectomy for local recurrence, distant metastases, 5-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival therefore concluding that it was reasonable to omit radiation therapy in this group. An update of the CALGB 9343 study in 2013 with 10-year follow-up came to the same conclusion. Previous analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the SEER database showed, however, that the majority of women with these characteristics were still receiving radiation therapy. We conducted this retrospective analysis from NCDB to identify factors associated with the use of radiation in this population. Methods: We reviewed the NCDB database and collected records of all breast cancer patients aged >70 years, who had hormone positive (HR+), pT1N0 disease between the years of 2004-2019. They were separated into radiation and non-radiation cohorts and then stratified based on ethnicity, age groups, insurance status, income quartiles, education quartiles, areas of residence, tumor size, comorbidities, diagnosis to treatment time, treatment facility type and geographic location. We then compared mortality between the two cohorts and completed a multivariate analysis to determine the demographic and clinical factors associated with the likelihood of receiving radiation. SAS was used for analysis and p-value < 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant. Results: 147,611 patients met the criteria of age > 70, pT1N0, HR+ treated with surgical lumpectomy. The majority of them were white, aged 70-75y, had Medicare, were in higher education and income quartiles and lived in metro areas (Table 1). 57.9% of the total study population received radiation. The possibility of receiving radiation decreased as age increased beyond 75 years. Uninsured patients, Medicare patients, those with comorbities, higher educational status as well as those who lived 20+ miles away from their treatment facility and treated at urban centers in central or south Atlantic areas were less likely to receive radiation. Those treated at Comprehensive community cancer programs and middle Atlantic areas were more likely to receive radiation. The possibility of radiation also progressively increased with tumor size. However, there were no differences observed when stratified by race, income status or chemotherapy use (Table 2). We also noted a small overall survival advantage for the radiation cohort (HR 0.77, p-value < 0.0001) which could be explained by the fact that patients without comorbidities were more likely to receive radiation. Discussion: Our results provide a real-world estimate of radiation use in pT1N0 HR+ early-stage breast cancer in women > 70 years. The major predictors of radiation use included younger age, low co-morbidities, insurance and institutions providing care. Lack of awareness about recent updates or concern about local recurrence could be contributing to the continued use of radiation. Although there are minor differences when stratified by demographics, it is concerning that the overall trend of radiation use has not significantly decreased over time. Since there is currently no data to support the routine use of radiation in this patient group as evidenced by randomized controlled trials, it is prudent to avoid radiation. This approach would help reduce healthcare costs, patient inconvenience and associated morbidity. Table 1 Baseline characteristics Table 2 Factors affecting radiation use Citation Format: Suma Sri Chennapragada, Runhua Shi, Shivani Sharma, Gary Burton. Predictive Factors for adjuvant radiation use in patients >70 years with pT1N0 HR+ breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-02-06.

Is postmastectomy radiotherapy necessary for breast cancer patients with clinically node-positive downstaging to ypN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

The significance of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients who initially have clinically node-positive (cN +) status but achieve downstaging to ypN0 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the impact of PMRT in this patient subset. Patients were enrolled from West China Hospital, Sichuan University from 2008 to 2019. Overall survival (OS), Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed with the log-rank test. The impact of PMRT was further analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the selection bias. Of the 333 eligible patients, 189 (56.8%) received PMRT, and 144 (43.2%) did not. At a median follow-up period of 71months, the five-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 99.1%, 93.4%, 96.4%, and 94.3% for the entire cohort, respectively. Additionally, the 5-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 98.9%, 93.8%, 96.7%, and 94.5% with PMRT and 99.2%, 91.3%, 94.9%, and 92.0% without PMRT, respectively (all p-values not statistically significant). After multivariate analysis, PMRT was not a significant risk factor for any of the endpoints. When further stratified by stage, PMRT did not show any survival benefit for patients with stage II-III diseases. In the context of comprehensive treatments, PMRT might be exempted in ypN0 breast cancer patients. Further large-scale, randomized controlled studies are required to investigate the significance of PMRT in this patient subset.

Five-year survival prognosis of young, middle-aged, and elderly adult female invasive breast cancer patients by clinical and lifestyle characteristics.

Early-onset breast cancer incidence has been increasing globally and in Taiwan. However, previous studies have not comprehensively examined how clinical and lifestyle characteristics influence the 5-year survival of breast cancer diagnosed at different stages of adulthood. We analyzed the Taiwan National Cancer Registry and Cause of Death datasets to understand how clinical factors (including tumor and treatment characteristics) and lifestyle factors (including body mass index, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption) were associated with the 5-year survival of 8471 young, 57,695 middle-aged, and 14,074 elderly female adult invasive breast cancer patients respectively diagnosed at age 20-39, 40-64, and ≥ 65 years between 2002 and 2015, with mortality follow-up to 2020. Poisson regression was used for obtaining the crude and adjusted 5-year survival risk ratios. Clinical and lifestyle characteristics were distributed differently but had mostly similar direction of association with 5-year survival for the three age groups. Receiving any treatment was associated with better survival, especially for elderly patients. Being underweight at initial cancer treatment was associated with worse survival than having normal weight, especially for elderly patients. Current smokers had worse survival than never smokers for middle-aged and elderly patients. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was not significantly higher for those of age 45-49 years than 40-44 years, despite the recommended starting screening age is 45 years in Taiwan. Our findings contribute to the understanding of early-onset and later-onset female breast cancer characteristics and prognosis, which may inform surveillance and treatment strategies to achieve better breast cancer prognosis.

An exploratory study of whether axillary lymph node dissection can be avoided in breast cancer patients with positive lymph nodes.

Breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph nodes usually require axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), with many postoperative complications, such as lymphedema. For these patients, whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can replace ALND has been a research hotspot in the field of breast cancer. This study developed two risk stratification models for predicting the clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph nodes receiving SLNB alone or ALND to determine which patients could potentially avoid ALND. A total of 21,942 breast cancer patients, including a training set (n=15,362) and a testing set (n=6,580), were enrolled in this study from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) between 2000 and 2017. The risk factors associated with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression analysis and then integrated into nomograms and risk stratification models examined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves. The survival discrepancies were compared between the SLNB and ALND subgroups with different risk scores with Kaplan-Meier plots. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, grade, marital status, T stage, radiotherapy and lymph node metastasis (GMTRL) were independent risk factors in breast cancer patients with both OS and BCSS status in the ALND cohort from the training set. Nomograms have been developed based on these factors to predict 3- and 5-year OS and BCSS in patients with ALND. Calibration curves and ROC curves in both the training and testing sets confirmed the excellent overall predictive performance of the nomograms. Furthermore, we developed two risk stratification models based on OS and BCSS status, revealing that patients with low GMTRL scores might avoid ALND in both OS and BCSS status [OS: hazard ratio (HR) =0.929, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.841-1.027, P=0.150; BCSS: HR =0.953, 95% CI: 0.831-1.094, P=0.495], but patients with moderate (OS: HR =0.756, 95% CI: 0.666-0.859, P<0.001; BCSS: HR =0.643, 95% CI: 0.537-0.768, P<0.001) and high GMTRL scores could not (OS: HR =0.719, 95% CI: 0.549-0.940, P=0.014; BCSS: HR =0.731, 95% CI: 0.549-0.974, P=0.031). Breast cancer patients with positive nodes could be treated with SLNB alone rather than ALND without affecting prognosis based on GMTRL scores. Patients with high or moderate GMTRL scores benefited greatly from ALND, but not for patients with low GMTRL scores. This study may assist clinicians in tailoring treatments.

ER+/PR− phenotype exhibits more aggressive biological features and worse outcome compared with ER+/PR+ phenotype in HER2-negative inflammatory breast cancer

The loss of progesterone receptor (PR) often predicts worse biological behavior and prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) breast cancer. However, the impact of PR status on inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has not been studied. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to investigate the influence of PR on IBC. Patients with ER+ and HER2-negative IBC were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Pearson’s χ2 test was used to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between patients with estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive (ER+/PR +) and patients with estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative (ER+/PR−). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the effects of PR status on the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in IBC. Overall, 1553 patients including 1157 (74.5%) patients with ER+/PR+ and 396 (25.5%) patients with ER+/PR− were analyzed in our study. The patients with ER+/PR− were more likely to be high histological grade (p < 0.001) and liver metastasis (p = 0.045) compared to patients with ER+/PR+. Despite higher chance of receiving chemotherapy (83.6% vs 77.3%, P = 0.008), patients with ER+/PR− showed worse BCSS (5-year BCSS rate, 34.3% vs 51.3%, P < 0.001) and OS (5-year OS rate, 31.3% vs 46.1%, P < 0.001) compared with ER+/PR+ phenotype. Multivariate survival analysis showed that patients with ER+/PR− still had worse BCSS (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.764, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.476–2.109, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 1.675, 95% CI 1.411–1.975, P < 0.001) than ER+/PR+ phenotype. Furthermore, patients with ER+/PR− showed worse outcomes than ER+/PR+ phenotype in most subgroups, especially in patients with younger age (≤ 60 years), lower histological grade, lymph node involved and distant metastasis. Patients with ER+/PR− had more aggressive biological behaviors and worse outcomes than patients with ER+/PR+ in IBC. Stronger treatments maybe needed for IBC patients with ER+/PR−.

Fatal and non-fatal breast cancers in women targeted by BreastScreen Norway: a cohort study.

Many breast cancer survivors experience anxiety related to dying from their disease even if it is detected at an early stage. We aimed to increase knowledge about fatal and non-fatal breast cancer by describing how histopathological tumour profiles and detection modes were associated with 10-year breast cancer-specific survival. This cohort study included data from women targeted by BreastScreen Norway (aged 50-69) and diagnosed with invasive breast cancer during 1996-2011. Breast cancer was classified as fatal if causing death within 10 years after diagnosis and non-fatal otherwise. We described histopathologic characteristics of fatal and non-fatal cancers, stratified by mode of detection. Recursive partitioning identified subgroups with differing survival profiles. In total, 6.3% of 9954 screen-detected cancers (SDC) were fatal, as were 17.4% of 3205 interval cancers (IC) and 20.9% of 3237 cancers detected outside BreastScreen Norway. Four to five subgroups with differing survival profiles were identified within each detection mode. Women with lymph node-negative SDC or Grade 1-2, node-negative IC without distant metastases had the highest 10-year survival (95-96%). Two subgroups representing 53% of the cohort had excellent (95-96%) 10-year breast cancer-specific survival. Most women with SDC had excellent survival, as did nearly 40% of women diagnosed with IC.

Assessment of geriatric and clinical domains for development and validation of a novel nomogram to predict the prognosis of older patients with breast cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study

BackgroundBreast cancer is a relatively heterogeneous disease in the older population. Survival in older breast cancer patients is not only affected by tumor-related factors, but also by geriatric assessment domains. How tumor clinical factors and geriatric factors specifically affect the survival rate of older patients and how to combine these two factors to predict the risk of death in older patients with breast cancer remain clinical questions to be addressed.MethodWe used the Peking Union Medical College Hospital database to identify older patients (≥65 years) who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2013 and December 2019. Of the 641 eligible patients, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical and geriatric data of 556 patients who formed our study population. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors and construct a nomogram to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. The performance of the constructed nomogram was evaluated using calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsMultivariate Cox regression analysis revealed seven independent prognostic factors associated with OS in older patients with breast cancer: age, tumor stage, lymph node stage, intrinsic molecular subtype, functional status, comorbidities, and psychological state. Nomogram based on these seven factors yielded excellent performance, with area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.748. Similarly, the nomogram for BCSS had an AUROC of 0.760. Moreover, the calibration curve and DCA revealed good predictive accuracy between the actual and predicted probabilities.ConclusionIndependent prognostic factors for OS and BCSS in older patients with breast cancer in China were determined in our study. A novel nomogram for predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and BCSS in this patient population was developed and validated. The nomogram exhibited good accuracy, indicating its potential for clinical decision making and improving outcomes.

The Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Female Patients With T3-4c Breast Cancer and 1-2 Positive Lymph Nodes: A Population-Based Cohort Study

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients diagnosed with cT3-4c breast cancer with no more than 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes. MethodsUsing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, this retrospective study identified patients diagnosed with T3-4c breast cancer between 2010 and 2015. These patients were then categorized into 2 groups: the SLNB group, which underwent examination of 1-5 regional lymph nodes and the axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) group, which underwent examination of ≥10 regional lymph nodes. Propensity score matching analysis was used to assess the efficacy of SLNB in cT3-4c patients. ResultsA total of 1139 patients were included in the analysis, with 423 and 716 patients in the SLNB and ALND groups, respectively. The 10-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates in the SLNB group were 66.1% and 76.3%, respectively, compared with 66.0% and 73.8%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of OS (HR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.80-1.25, P = .997) and BCSS (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.83-1.41, P = .551). Even after 1:1 propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in OS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.65-1.16, P = .341) and BCSS (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.59-1.16, P = .266) between the 2 groups. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that SLNB does not adversely affect the survival of cT3-4c breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel lymph node metastases.

Is There a Survival Difference Between Male and Female Breast Cancer Subtypes According to the Prognostic Staging System? A Population-Based Cohort Study.

In retrospective studies investigating the difference in survival by gender, there are conflicting results. It was aimed to compare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in male and female breast cancer subtypes according to the prognostic staging system. Overall survival rates and BCSS rates of patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2019 compared by gender for all cohorts, stages, and molecular subtypes using the SEER Database. The stage has been rearranged according to the eighth edition of the AJCC. 364039 patients were included in the study. .7% (n = 2503) of all breast cancers were male breast cancer. Overall survival (male: 5-year OS 73.9%, female = 5-year OS 86%) and BCSS rates (male: 5-year BCSS 78.9%, female = 5-year BCSS 94.7%) were significantly higher in females than in males for all cohorts. OS (male: 5-year OS 66.2% vs female: 5-year OS 88.3%), and BCSS (male: 5-year BCSS 88.4% vs female: 5-year 93.6%) rates were higher in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/Her2-negative female patients. Overall survival rate is higher in females in stage I (male: 5-year OS 81.5%, female: 5-year OS 92.8%), and BCSS rate is higher in stage I (male: 5-year BCSS 94.8%, female: 5-year BCSS 97.5%). Males have 2 times (HR = 2.023) higher overall mortality risk than females, but the risk of dying from breast cancer is only 1.6 times (HR = 1.596) higher. Breast cancer-specific mortality is significantly higher in male breast cancers, especially in the early stage, and HR-positive subtype than females.

Effectiveness of post-mastectomy adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with prognostic stage IB breast cancer: A SEER-based study.

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is an important, effective treatment for breast cancer. This study evaluates the effectiveness of post-mastectomy AC in treating patients with prognostic stage IB breast cancer. We conducted a retrospective cohort-based study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox risk models were used to identify the impact of AC. Stratified analysis was performed according to molecular subtypes, anatomic stages, and other risk factors to evaluate the effect of AC on survival. 28,825 women diagnosed with prognostic stage IB breast cancer were included. The 5-year OS was significantly higher in AC group than in non-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group (P<0.0001); however, the 5-year BCSS in AC group was significantly lower than in NAC group (P=0.039). Multivariate analysis revealed that AC was a favorable prognostic factor for OS (P<0.001), but not BCSS (P=0.407). AC was not an independent prognostic factor for BCSS in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR[+]/HER2[-]) subtype or pT1a-1b/N0-1 stage with HER2 overexpression (HER2[+]) subtype, regardless of whether HR was positive or negative (P>0.05). Meanwhile, AC is not an independent prognostic factor for OS and BCSS in patients with lymph node micrometastases. Our study demonstrates that patients with prognostic stage IB do not fully benefit from AC. Individualized treatment management is required for patients with pT1a-1b/N0-1 tumors, lymph node micrometastases, or HR(+)/HER2(-) subtypes.

Secretory Carcinoma of Breast: A Population-Based Study.

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the characteristic features and survival of secretory carcinoma of the breast (SCB), which is one of the rare malignant tumors of the breast. Data of patients with histopathological diagnosis of SCB between 2010 and 2019 were extracted from the SEER database. These patients were evaluated in terms of age, race, molecular subtype, grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 receptor, TNM stage, surgical status, chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of the whole population and subgroups [in terms of surgery procedure (mastectomy/breast-conserving surgery), and hormone receptor status (positive/negative)] were analyzed. 70 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 57years (range 2-82). 32.9% of the patients were diagnosed under the age of 50. 97.1% of the patients were female; 2.9% were male. The vast majority of patients were white race (81.4%). Although the rates of localization were higher in the upper outer quadrant (31.4%), centrally located tumors (18.5%) were also quite common. The most frequently detected molecular subtype was hormone positive/HER2 negative. All patients were non-metastatic, 81.4% of patients did not have lymph node metastases, and most of the patients were stage IA. Median follow-up was 37months (range 0-118months). Considering all patients, OS was 76.3%, 5-year OS was 91.8%, and BCSS was 88%, 5-year BCSS was 97.8%. There was no statistically significant difference in OS and BCSS according to subgroups (P > .01). SCB, a rare histopathologic type, has high OS and BCSS rates.

Real-World Evidence on the Use of Endocrine Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Patients Treated With Breast-Conserving Surgery Followed by Postoperative Radiation Therapy: A Brazilian Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction/BackgroundThis study aims to evaluate the reproducibility of findings from randomized controlled trials regarding adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) for breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in a real-life scenario. Materials/MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo database. It included DCIS patients DCIS who received breast-conserving surgery and postoperative radiation therapy. The endpoints were local control (LC), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS). ResultsWe analyzed 2192 patients treated between 2000 and 2020. The median FU was 48.99 months. Most patients (53.33%; n = 1169) received adjuvant HT. Patients not receiving adjuvant HT tend to be older (P = .021) and have a lower educational level (P < .001). At the end of FU, 1.5% of patients had local recurrence, and there was no significant difference between groups (P = .19). The 10-year OS and BCSS were 89.4% and 97.5% for adjuvant HT versus 91.5% and 98.5% for no adjuvant HT, respectively, and there were no significant differences between groups. The 10-year OS was 93.25% for medium/high education level versus 87.31% for low (HR for death 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.83; P = .007). ConclusionsThe benefits of adjuvant HT for DCIS were not reproduced in a Brazilian cohort. Education significantly impacted survival and HT usage, reflecting the influence of socioeconomic factors. These findings can allow for more precise interventions.

Prognosis of post-neoadjuvant therapy patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction: a SEER-based, propensity-matched study

ObjectiveThe application of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) for post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) patients was controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term survival outcomes of IBR for these patients.MethodsData between January 2010 and November 2017 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the influence of confounding factors between the mastectomy alone group (MA) and the mastectomy with IBR group (IBR). The rates of 5 year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were compared by Kaplan–Meier curves with log-rank test.ResultsThe IBR was associated with improved 5-year BCSS in the IBR group before PSM (88.5 vs. 79.1%, P < 0.001). The proportion of IBR increased from 21.5% in 2010 to 28.2% in 2017. After PSM, a total of 9,610 patients were enrolled for survival analysis (4,805 in each group). In the complete response (CR) group, the 5-year BCSS rates did not differ (93.4 vs. 95.6%, P = 0.16). In the non-CR group, the 5-year BCSS rate was higher in patients who received IBR (82.5% 79.4%, P = 0.034).ConclusionIn general, the application of IBR among post-NAT patients has steadily increased from 2010 to 2017. In the CR group, survival outcomes of post-NAT patients who received IBR were similar to those who received mastectomy alone. In the non-CR group, IBR was associated with potential survival benefits. More studies are expected to validate our findings.

Survival and Trends in Annualized Hazard Function by Age at Diagnosis Among Chinese Breast Cancer Patients Aged ≤40 Years: Case Analysis Study

Background Young breast cancer patients are more likely to develop aggressive tumor characteristics and a worse prognosis than older women, and different races and ethnicities have distinct epidemiologies and prognoses. However, few studies have evaluated the clinical biological features and relapse patterns in different age strata of young women in Asia. Objective We aimed to explore survival differences and the hazard function in young Chinese patients with breast cancer (BC) by age. Methods The patients were enrolled from West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The chi-squared test, a Kaplan-Meier analysis, a log-rank test, a Cox multivariate hazards regression model, and a hazard function were applied for data analysis. Locoregional recurrence–free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS), breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) were defined as end points. Results We included 1928 young BC patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2019. Patients aged 18 to 25, 26 to 30, 31 to 35, and 36 to 40 years accounted for 2.7% (n=53), 11.8% (n=228), 27.7% (n=535), and 57.7% (n=1112) of the patients, respectively. The diagnosis of young BC significantly increased from 2008 to 2019. Five-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS for the entire population were 98.3%, 93.4%, 94.4%, and 94%, respectively. Patients aged 18 to 25 years had significantly poorer 5-year LRFS (P&lt;.001), 5-year DMFS (P&lt;.001), 5-year BCSS (P=.04), and 5-year OS (P=.04) than those aged 31 to 35, 26 to 30, and 36 to 40 years. The hazard curves for recurrence and metastasis for the whole cohort continuously increased over the years, while the BC mortality risk peaked at 2 to 3 years and then slowly decreased. When stratified by age, the annualized hazard function for recurrence, metastasis, and BC mortality in different age strata showed significantly different trends, especially for BC mortality. Conclusions The annual diagnosis of young BC seemed to increase in Chinese patients, and the distinct age strata of young BC patients did not differ in survival outcome or failure pattern. Our results might provide strategies for personalized management of young BC.

Breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

To compare recurrence and survival outcomes between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The data of 730 patients who underwent NACT between 2000 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 104 (14.2%) patients received BCS and 626 (85.8%) received mastectomy. Locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastases (DM), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of BCS versus mastectomy on outcomes was assessed by multivariate Cox models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates between the two groups. The median follow-up of BCS and mastectomy groups were 86.5 and 87.4 months, respectively. There were significant differences in distribution of most baseline characteristics between two groups. Compared with those who underwent mastectomy, the patients with BCS had similar 5-year LRR, DM, and DFS rates, but had significantly higher 5-year BCSS (98.9% vs. 90.4%, P = 0.005) and OS (98.9% vs. 90.1%, P = 0.003) rates. Multivariate analysis also showed that BCS significantly improved BCSS (HR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08-0.85, P = 0.025) and OS (HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.79, P = 0.018). After IPTW adjustment, the LRR, DM, DFS, BCSS and OS between two groups had no significant differences. The recurrence and survival outcomes are comparable with BCS and mastectomy. Thus, BCS is a safe treatment option for selected breast cancer patients after NACT.

The disparities in prognostic prediction and annualized hazard function in different molecular subtypes between young Chinese and White American women with breast cancer.

The prognostic disparities in different molecular subtypes between young Chinese and White American breast cancer patients remain unclear. The goal of this study was to explore the prognostic differences in different molecular subtypes between Chinese and White American patients aged ≤ 40 years. We included Chinese and White female breast cancer patients at or under the age of 40 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) and the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The chi-square test, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model were employed to evaluate the distribution and survival disparities in the two racial/ethnic cohorts and different molecular subtypes. An annualized hazard function was used to calculate the annual failure rate among different molecular subtypes. This study included 20,859 female breast cancer patients at or under the age of 40, of whom 18,400 were White women and 2,459 were Chinese women. With a median follow-up time of 47 months, the 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates for young Chinese and White women were 93.9% and 90.0%, respectively (P< 0.001). Molecular subtype was found to be a significant predictor in both young Chinese and White patients (P< 0.001), but different trends were observed in the two racial/ethnic cohorts when exploring the association between BCSS and molecular subtypes. Among young White patients, the hormone receptor (HoR) (+)/epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (+) subtype had the best 5-year BCSS rate, while in young Chinese patients, the HoR (+)/HER2 (+) and HoR (+)/HER2 (-) showed comparable survival curves and both showed superior 5-year BCSS than other subtypes. Stratification by molecular subtypes, young Chinese patients demonstrated a superior 5-year BCSS in HoR (+)/HER2 (-) (96.3% vs 92.9%, P< 0.001) and triple-negative subtypes (88% vs 81.7%, P= 0.006) compared to young White American patients, while no significant differences were found in HoR (+)/HER2 (+) and HER2 enriched tumors. The annual hazard function for BCSS showed that there were significantly different trends in the HoR (+)/HER2 (-) and HoR (+)/HER2 (+) subtypes between young Chinese and White patients. There are disparities in prognosis and annualized hazard function between young Chinese and White females with breast cancer in different molecular subtypes.

The Added Prognostic Value of Oncotype Recurrence Score to AJCC Prognostic Staging System in Stage III ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer.

Prognostic prediction based on prognostic stage (PS) with the Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) has not been validated in stage III ER+/HER2- breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the added prognostic significance of RS incorporated with the PS system and to compare the prognostic prediction improvement with anatomic TNM stage (AS) using nomogram construction. The SEER database was indexed to identify ER+/HER2- invasive ductal or lobular breast cancer in AS IIIA-IIIC with RS results diagnosed from 2004 to 2013. Patients with RS < 18, 18-30 and > 30 were categorized into low-, intermediate- and high-risk RS groups. Comparisons of the distribution of clinical-pathologic characteristics among RS risk groups were performed using Pearson's chi-square test. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared across RS or PS by log-rank test. Cox regression was used to evaluate the factors independently related to BCSS. A nomogram comprised of PS and RS was constructed with discrimination, calibration and clinical benefit evaluated. Altogether 629 patients who received RS were enrolled. There were 326 cases (51.8%) with low-risk RS, 237 (37.7%) with intermediate-risk RS and 66 (10.5%) with high-risk RS; 344 patients (54.7%) had PS IB, 84 (13.4%) had IIB, 150 (23.8%) had IIIA, 46 (7.3%) had IIIB, and only 5 had (0.8%) IIIC. Both PS and RS were independent prognostic factors for BCSS. There were significant or trends of differences in survival among RS within subtypes stratified by PS. There were significant differences in survival among PS only within intermediate-risk RS. A nomogram prediction 5-year BCSS was constructed with a c-index of 0.811. Lower histologic grade, positive PR and fewer positive lymph nodes were independently correlated with low-risk RS. PS incorporated with RS had improved prognostic significance for stage III ER+/HER 2- breast cancer.

Novel nomograms for predicting survival for immediate breast reconstruction patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer-a single-center 15-year experience.

Immediate breast reconstruction is widely accepted following oncologic mastectomy. This study aimed to build a novel nomogram predicting the survival outcome for Chinese patients undergoing immediate reconstruction following mastectomy for invasive breast cancer. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing immediate reconstruction following treatment for invasive breast cancer was performed from May 2001 to March 2016. Eligible patients were assigned to a training set or a validation set. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to select associate variables. Two nomograms were developed based on the training cohort for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Internal and external validations were performed, and the C-index and calibration plots were generated to evaluate the performance (discrimination and accuracy) of the models. The 10-year estimated BCSS and DFS were 90.80% (95% CI: 87.30%-94.40%) and 78.40% (95% CI: 72.50%-84.70%), respectively, in the training cohort. In the validation cohort, they were and 85.60% (95% CI, 75.90%-96.50%) and 84.10% (95% CI, 77.80%-90.90%), respectively. Ten independent factors were used to build a nomogram for prediction of 1-, 5- and 10-year BCSS, while nine were used for DFS. The C-index was 0.841 for BCSS and 0.737 for DFS in internal validation, and the C-index was 0.782 for BCSS and 0.700 for DFS in external validation. The calibration curve for both BCSS and DFS demonstrated acceptable agreement between the predicted and actual observation in the training and the validation cohorts. The nomograms provided valuable visualization of factors predicting BCSS and DFS in invasive breast cancer patients with immediate breast reconstruction. The nomograms may have tremendous potential in guiding individualized decision-making for physicians and patients in choosing the optimized treatment methods.

Better survival was found in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery compared with mastectomy in malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast.

Malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast (MPTB) is a rare type of breast cancer. The prognosis between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy remains unclear in MPTB. Therefore, long-term survival was investigated between BCS and mastectomy in MPTB via the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. MPTB patients with T1-2/N0 stage between 2000 and 2015 from SEER database were retrospectively reviewed. Prognosis between different surgical approaches was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards analysis. A total of 795 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 126months. BCS was associated with significantly increased 10-year overall survival (OS) (89.2% vs. 81.1%, p = 0.002) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (95.2% vs. 90%, p = 0.004) compared with mastectomy. Multivariate analysis showed better OS (HR = 0.587, 95% CI 0.406-0.850, p = 0.005) and BCSS (HR = 0.463, 95%CI 0.267-0.804, p = 0.006) in the BCS group than the mastectomy group. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), improved 10-year OS (89.2% vs.81%, p = 0.023) and BCSS (95.8% vs. 90.1%, p = 0.033) were observed in BCS compared with mastectomy. This study found the survival benefit of BCS over mastectomy in patients with early-stage MPTB. BCS should be recommended as a priority in MPTB patients when both surgical approaches are feasible.